Hamlet's prime opportunity comes in Act 3, Scene 3. Hamlet has seen the king react to the players, he is convinced of his guilt. He comes upon Claudius praying. The stage direction has Hamlet enter as he finishes (though obviously you could play this so Hamlet hears the whole confession). Earlier Hamlet heard the ghost of his father complain that he was in hell because he had been taken unawares. Now if he dispatches Claudius while he's in a state of grace then the villain will go to heaven.
Hamlet:
Now might I do it pat, now he is praying;So in his speech he decides to wait a bit:
And now I'll do't. And so he goes to heaven;
And so am I revenged. That would be scann'd:
A villain kills my father; and for that,
I, his sole son, do this same villain send
To heaven.
Up, sword; and know thou a more horrid hent:That's the straight reading of course. We don't have to take it at face value. This could be Hamlet's way of avoiding a conflict. That's one of the beauties of Shakespeare, there is plenty of room for interpretaion.
When he is drunk asleep, or in his rage,
Or in the incestuous pleasure of his bed;
At game, a-swearing, or about some act
That has no relish of salvation in't;
Then trip him, that his heels may kick at heaven,
And that his soul may be as damn'd and black
As hell, whereto it goes.
What's interesting to me is that if you changed the title of the play to 'Claudius, King of Denmark' you would have the classic tragedy. Just picture it, a man seeks the throne. Maybe he just wants power. Maybe he thinks that the king is unworthy. Maybe it's a scheme born out of lust with Gertrude. Who knows? Anyway, he has taken the top spot through poison and in the end, by poison he dies.
Classic.
Is his hesitancy a tragic flaw? Does it result from conscience, that doth make cowards of us all? If so, then he'd kill himself quickly if he didn't have it. He'd also have killed Claudius long before ascertaining his guilt, which would make him a rash murderer.
ReplyDeleteI wonder what would have happened after Hamlet killed Claudius. He has no proof other than the word of a ghost. Even if he told other people about the confession, there would be plenty who wouldn't believe him. Hamlet would have been a rank regicide. I don't know enough about the law of the time but that probably wouldn't have ended well for him either.
Delete