Saturday, April 7, 2012

Authorship of Matthew and Acts

I asked my father, a former Bible college professor, for some info on the authorship of our two books of the Bible. I hope this may lure him into the comment section . . .

Introduction to Matthew

Nowhere does the first gospel name its author. The universal testimony of the early church beginning with Papias (c. A.D. 135) is that the apostle Matthew wrote it, and our earliest textual witnesses attribute it to him. If Papias is right, the theory of Matthew's authorship may receive gentle support from passages like 10:3, where on this theory the apostle refers to himself in a self-deprecating way not found in Mark or Luke.


At the broadest level we may say that Matthew's purpose is to demonstrate that (1) Jesus is the promised Messiah, the Son of David, the Son of God, the Son of Man, Immanuel; (2) many Jews, and especially the leaders, sinfully failed to perceive this during his ministry; (3) the messianic kingdom has already dawned, inaugurated by the life, ministry, death, resurrection, and exaltation of Jesus; (4) this messianic reign, characterized by obedience to Jesus and consummated by his return, is the fulfillment of OT prophetic hopes; (5) the church, the community of those, both Jew and Gentile, who bow unqualifiedly to Jesus' authority, constitutes the true locus of the people of God and the witness to the world of the "gospel of the kingdom"; (6) throughout this age Jesus' true disciples must overcome temptation, endure persecution from a hostile world, witness to the truth of the Gospel, and live in deeply rooted submission to Jesus' ethical demands.

ACTS OF THE APOSTLES — the one historical book of the New Testament, which traces the development of the early church after the ascension of Jesus. Standing between the Gospels and the Epistles, the Book of Acts is a bridge between the life of Jesus and the ministry of the apostle Paul. As such, it offers invaluable information about the development of the early church.
The title of Acts is somewhat misleading, for only a few of the apostles of Jesus are mentioned in the book. In reality, Acts relates some acts of some of the apostles, primarily Peter and Paul, and involves a time-span of about 32 years—from the ascension of Jesus (about a.d. 30) to Paul’s imprisonment in Rome (about a.d. 62)
Authorship and Date. There can be little doubt that the Book of Acts and the Gospel of Luke come from the same author. Each book is the length of a scroll (about 35 feet), and each is addressed to the same individual, Theophilus. The similarities between the Gospel of Luke and the Book of Acts in literary style, vocabulary, and theological ideas are unmistakable. Although the author does not identify himself by name, scholars have ascribed the authorship of both books to Luke, the companion of Paul.
Luke is a reliable historian, in part because of the sources he used. He was closely associated with many events of Paul’s mission, and this results in greater vividness in the latter half of Acts. At three places in Acts (16:10–17, 20:5–21:18, and 27:1—28:16) the narrative changes to the first person plural (“we”), indicating that Luke was personally present. Luke also may have had access to written documents (for example, the decree of the Council of Jerusalem, Acts 15:23; or letters from early Christian leaders).

2 comments:

  1. I've found that determining authorship of Biblical texts is quite a complicated business. Our earliest manuscripts aren't very early. We do have the church fathers to verify that the books existed by their time, but they only contain passages, not entire books. Passing a text off in the name of a famous spiritual person was a pretty common practice. I've looked into individual books, but not enough to retain it all. Authorship has to be taken on a book by book, and even on a passage by passage basis with the Bible. I hope you father does comment.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I hope he does too since he has studied this quite a bit. It seems like research into the authorship questions has advanced quite a bit in the last century or so. They keep finding more and more early stuff.

      Delete